I vote NO. When I bought my '89 Reatta in 1993, I thought that such a sporty looking car would hold its value and appreciate over time. I based this logic on my '64 Corvette which I bought in 1968. I paid $2450 for the Corvette and sold it in 1992 for over $20,000. I thought that I could enjoy the Reatta and make money at the same time. Unfortunately, the Reatta is now worth much less than I paid for it. The question is WHY? Certainly the Reatta looks as good or perhaps better than the mid year Corvettes which now sell for $50,000 or more. True, performance is a factor for some folks. However, I think the main reason is that the Reatta was targeted for the adult market, and when the original adult market aged out there was nothing left to keep the Reatta visible to the public. To further compound things, the Reatta production numbers were low.
The analogy I will use is the success of the Corvette. When I was going up, I remember seeing Buzz and Todd on the TV show Route 66 in their Corvette. I can remember looking at that '62 Corvette and saying to myself that someday I will get one. Well, GM benefitted from that and a legacy was developed where youth aged to adult hood and the Corvette came along in the hearts and minds of its following. So the Corvette became America's sports car in the minds of the public. Even though there are many, many, more Corvettes than Reattas, the rarity and looks of the Reatta fall on deaf ears as no one knows about them. We all see folks say "what is that car" or "how beautiful the Reatta is" so we know that the Reatta is a desirable car but no ones that it exists. The economic reality of supply vs demand applies here...........